Is It Wrong to Say Someone is Wrong?

My Beth Moore posts gather the most visits to my site and nothing else is even close. Which is kind of funny since I initially did all that research for someone else’s website. Anyway, I recently received a very kind letter from a woman named Mary who had read my main post on Beth Moore and wanted to address some concerns she had. Now I do not know Mary, but the letter is very kind. While being well-intentioned, it also contains a number of common errors that are overwhelming our Christian churches these days. So, I want to use her letter as an opportunity to attempt to teach Mary and others like her (and perhaps you) to identify the problems with this type of reasoning. Errors that are being indoctrinated into us in our world that teaches us to “coexist.”

This is a really long article, so I would recommend packing a lunch before we begin. Ready? Then let’s dive in. Mary begins:

I read your post on Beth Moore as a false teacher — and recognized myself in you. I was moved to write to you — not to attack or defend Beth Moore or you, but to tell you what I see in this. I don’t expect you to publish this comment, but I hope you find it useful (Mary).

Well Mary, I am publishing your comment! And I do genuinely thank you for taking the time to write and the obvious concern with which you have written to me. I hope you may likewise find my reply to you useful. I also hope you take this response in the love in which it is intended. It is so difficult to come across as loving when you are disagreeing with someone in writing.

I am 75 years old, having been a student of the Bible all my life and a devoted Christian for 65 years. (Mary)

Praise God! I can only wish I had become a student of the Bible as early in my life as you. It is with respect and trepidation that I will be trying to correct one of my elders in the faith. Yet, in the words of Paul to Timothy: “Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity” (1 Timothy 4:12). So, I press on carefully.

In my 20′s I might have written what you wrote about Beth Moore, because I was trained in that way of thinking and understanding scripture and judging the rightness of other people — that there is a right way and a wrong way, and of course my understanding of scripture is the right way, because I would never accept the wrong way, right? 🙂 (Mary).

Now Mary, here is where we run into our first big problem. You appear to be implying here (and through the rest of your letter) that there is not a right way or a wrong way to understand Scripture. I find it so very interesting that you wrote me to tell me that I was wrong to write that others are wrong. The very act of your writing to me actually proves my position that there is a right and a wrong.

If there is no right or wrong way, then there is actually no way at all. The words of the Bible have no real meaning if they cannot be determined to be right or wrong. When you wrote to me, you assumed that I would understand what you are communicating to me. You assumed that I would determine the right way to understand what you have written. It is no different when God communicates to us through his written word, the Bible. God had a meaning when He inspired it, and we should always strive to understand His meaning. Let’s take a simple example from the Bible:

But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. He is not here, for he has risen, as he said. Come, see the place where he lay. (Matthew 28:5-6).

This passage makes a number of truth claims that we must judge as to their veracity. Was Jesus really crucified? Had he really risen from the dead? Was there really an angel that spoken these words to Mary on that Easter morning? I do not doubt that you would answer a resounding “yes” to all 3 of my questions. Now, here is where the hard question comes in. If someone were to say that Jesus was not raised from the dead, are they wrong? Would you, Mary, judge the rightness of a person who believed there was no resurrection from the dead? Would it be appropriate to tell them they were wrong? Does it matter if someone were to wrongly teach that there was no resurrection? Absolutely! Let’s hear what the apostle Paul had to say about this:

And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain (1 Corinthians 15:14).

Now, you may object here and say that the issue of the resurrection is much bigger than the things I have identified as false teachings by Beth Moore. While that may be true, I chose this example to demonstrate the principle here. The underlying principle being that there absolutely, positively must be a right and a wrong way to understand the Scriptures. If we read the Bible and come to the conclusion that Jesus was not raised from the dead, our faith is in vain and we will die in our sins. Not only would our interpretation be wrong, but that error would have eternal consequences. We actually need someone to tell us we are wrong! It is the most loving thing someone could do for us! Let me say that again, because it gets lost so often. The most loving thing someone could do for us if we believe in a false God, a false Jesus, a false gospel, or other errors in our doctrine is to tell us we are wrong. It would be a hateful thing to not point out their errors and teach them about the real Jesus and the true, life-saving gospel. Now to tell someone they are wrong, we must first actually believe there is even a concept of right and wrong.

So I studied hard to be sure I had it right, feeling responsible to correct the errors of other people, graduating summa cum laud from a Christian college and spending many years in verse by verse study of the Bible (Mary).

Hurrah! Imagine for a moment that I completely flipped that paragraph around and we imagined a person named NotMary who writes:

So I never studied to be sure I had it right because there is no right or wrong. I felt no responsibility to correct the errors of other people because there is no such thing as an error. I dropped out of a Christian college and never read the Bible because it just does not matter what you believe (NotMary).

Would you cheer for NotMary? If there is no right or wrong way to interpret Scripture then NotMary’s experiences are just as useful as yours, the real Mary. And if you want to think really carefully about this, those two paragraphs above from Mary and NotMary say exactly the same thing if there is no right and wrong way to interpret what was written. Ridiculous, right? But that is exactly what the conclusion we must come to if there are no right or wrong ways to interpret what is written. The words lose all meaning. Of course, no one actually lives this way in the rest of their communication, we likewise should not think it is true when we read God’s communication to us in the Bible.

Then things happened that gave me deeper insights into scripture and my own faith in God (Mary).

Mary, here is where I would really like you to pause for a moment. You have just claimed that you have obtained deeper insights into Scripture. You are implying several important things:

1. that the Scriptures have meaning,
2. that the meaning can be understood, and
3. that you have obtained a better understand of that meaning.

You have, in effect, admitted that at one point in your life you were wrong, but then changed your beliefs so they were right (or at least more right than before). If there is no right or wrong way to interpret Scripture, this claim of yours has no meaning. You cannot have a deeper insight, only a different insight. And, if you cannot judge other people’s concepts of right and wrong, on what basis could you even judge your own understanding of the Scripture to make the claim that you now had deeper insight? You could only claim that your views had changed, not whether they were better or deeper. You have made a value judgment, but you want to do that in the context of rejecting value judgments.

There is also an important value judgment contained in that last part of that statement. You write about obtaining a deeper insight into your own faith in God. How do you know that your faith is in the one true God? Seriously, how do you know? And does it even matter? Here in the great state of Idaho where I live, the dominant religion is Mormonism. These LDS people are typically wonderfully nice, intelligent, upstanding citizens. Many have studied the Scriptures and have a great faith in things they call “God” and “Jesus.” They believe that there are many gods, that the God of our planet used to be a man on another planet, that Jesus is the created spirit brother of Lucifer, and one day they may be exalted to become gods themselves (and that is just a tip of the iceberg). Mary, would you say that the LDS interpretation of Scripture is wrong? Would you say their faith in God is wrong?

Briefly, my oldest daughter was born with a significant handicap and limited intellectual ability. As she has lived her life, and is now 53 years old, I have seen the value in her life as she demonstrates love and faith, teaching others a deeper meaning of love — and of faith — even with her limited understanding. Before God, she is equal to the greatest scholar and will not be judged by Him for her lack of understanding (Mary).

I am sorry for your daughter’s handicaps, but I am even more pleased you see the value in her life! This may surprise you Mary, but I completely agree with your conclusion in this paragraph. Your daughter is not going to be judged by her lack of a detailed understanding of Christian theology. Just as I believe an infant can be saved by God’s work of regeneration in their lives to grant them faith, so too He can work that miracle in people like your daughter. It is no less of a miracle that they can come to repentance and faith than it is for me and for you.

And, I am sure you look forward to the day when your daughter is glorified in heaven and the effects of sin on her broken mind and body are removed. When she can freed of her limitations and have a better knowledge and a deeper understanding of Jesus and what he has done. All of us who are in Christ desire that! But to desire these things we must realize that there is a right knowledge of God and His work of salvation to be understood and even to be desired. There is right knowledge and wrong knowledge.

We also have Jesus’ parable of the talents in Matthew 25:15-30 that teaches that while we may not all have the same gifts, we must put to proper use the gifts we have been given. And, if we do not, there are consequences. If my knowledge and your own knowledge of the Scriptures was at the same level as your daughter’s would that be a good thing considering we have been given greater gifts in the particular area of intellectual ability? Similarly, if my 3-year old daughter’s knowledge of Scripture never progressed from what she knows today because she was never taught, it would be a tragedy (and a sin on my part!).

For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food, for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child. But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil. Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity (Hebrews 5:12-6:1).

We see in that passage the Bible chastises those who have remained immature in the faith and urges to press on to a mature doctrine.

I met other people who were devoted Christians but who understood key passages of scripture completely differently from the way I was taught. I was convinced I was right, they were convinced they were right (Mary).

How do you know they were devoted Christians? What does it even mean to be a “Christian”? I have many Mormon friends and relatives who say they are devoted Christians, and we disagree completely regarding what is taught in the Bible. We disagree on the nature of God, the Trinity, the nature of man, the way of salvation, the gospel, heaven, hell, judgment…I could go on and on. They are “devoted” in the sense that they pray regularly, attend church weekly, tithe, and do good for others. Are they “devoted Christians” if they have the wrong Jesus? Or are they merely devoted idolaters despite their claim to be Christians? I am convinced that I am right, and they are convinced they are right. Does it matter? Yes, with eternal consequences.

Who is the judge? God alone (Mary).

Agreed. But God has already declared His judgment in the Scriptures. For example, in Jesus’ own words we read:

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God (John 3:17-18, emphasis mine).

That is a judgment of condemnation declared by God. And we, as Christians, must declare God’s judgment to others as a warning to them. We are not judging, but pronouncing God’s judgment. We are heralds of the king to bring both warning and good news. It is part of the great commission in Matthew 28:18-20 that we make disciples (students) who observe all that Jesus commanded. It makes no sense to make students if there is no right and wrong because there is nothing for them to learn and nothing to observe rightly.

I had been taught that these people were not even Christian because they had it wrong (Mary).

Mary, I hope by this point is that you realize that there has to be a right and a wrong that defines whether or not someone is a Christian. And, it must go beyond a self-proclamation that one is a Christian. I can say I am a medical doctor, but I doubt you would trust me to do your surgery without seeing the credentials on the wall and some proof of my knowledge of medicine. My claim to be a doctor does not make me one. Neither does someone’s claim to be a Christian make them one.

The Biblical, historic Christian faith is founded upon a set of core beliefs. Beliefs that have been summarized in things like the Apostles, Nicene and Athanasian creeds. For example, the beliefs that there is only one God and that Jesus was God-in-flesh. Rejecting these beliefs means rejecting the Christian faith. Now, an infant or a person who is immature in the faith may not understand these concepts. However, it is the people who can know and understand, but reject the fundamental beliefs that are not Christians. Your daughter accepts by faith what she can comprehend. She does not reject the light that she has received.

Yet in our common love and trust in the Lord, we had a bond of faith. So I opened my heart to them and we shared our mutual convictions. Sometimes we just agreed to disagree, but we stopped arguing (Mary).

Again, I turn you to my Mormon friends and relatives. This is not an idle thought exercise as I have people I deeply love who are Mormons. We both profess a love and trust in the Lord Jesus Christ. However, what we mean by “Lord Jesus Christ” is two entirely different things. There is no common meaning to those words. Do I have a bond of faith with these professing “Christians”? We both have faith, but it is faith in entirely different things. Can I just agree to disagree and not worry about our differences? Absolutely not because I love them. God has made it clear in the Scriptures that if they continue worshipping a false god and putting their trust in a false gospel, they are already condemned (John 3:18). Jesus himself taught about people who would face eternal separation from God despite their claims they knew Jesus and did mighty works in his name:

Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’ (Matthew 7:21-23).

They called Jesus Lord, but were not allowed to enter the kingdom of heaven. We are either Universalists and everyone goes to heaven, or there is some metric by which true Christians are identified.

We did not talk about “grace” much in my early years. I could tell you then that it meant “unmerited favor”, but I actually had little idea of what that meant. As I continued to study, I came to understand that the blood of Christ “keeps on cleansing” us as we walk in the light. That was light a light coming on. Then one day it dawned on me that I had been given to understand that God will forgive our sins — but if we have our doctrine wrong, we are in big trouble. That makes no sense (Mary).

Mary, you highlight a very common error here. The term “doctrine” has received a bad reputation recently, but it merely means a set of beliefs. In the same paragraph in which you essentially declare that doctrine is not important, you describe a lot of doctrine that you hold:

• The idea of grace meaning unmerited favor
• The blood of Christ
• Cleansing
• Walking in the light
• God
• Forgiveness of our sins

Those are all part of your doctrine–your set of beliefs. Would someone be in “big trouble” if their belief in the forgiveness of sins is wrong? You bet! If they believed that forgiveness of sins came through faith in the Easter Bunny, as a ridiculous example. So, yes, if we have our doctrine wrong, we are in big trouble. Wrong God, wrong Jesus, wrong gospel, wrong Scriptures, and wrong understanding of sin equals wrong doctrine and big trouble.

Mary, you also continue to demonstrate that you actually believe there is a right way and a wrong way to understand Scripture since you are coming to a better understanding. Again, if there is no right way, all you could claim is that your beliefs changed, not that they improved.

Soon I began to notice that I had some ways of looking at scripture that also did not make sense (Mary).

Unfortunately to be consistent, it makes no sense for you to write that your way of looking at Scripture did not make sense. It was neither right nor wrong. Therefore it was neither logical or illogical, sensible or nonsensical. It was just an opinion of yours that changed.

Taking some passages as direct commands/instruction for today gave them different meaning from what the original readers could possibly have gleaned (Mary).

At this point, I am beating a dead horse, but by the “logic” that there is no right or wrong, arriving at a different meaning from the original readers is perfectly valid. The human authors could have had one meaning in mind when they wrote it, the original readers could arrive at a different meaning, and you and I could come to third and fourth meanings. No problem or big problem? God had a meaning that was right when He inspired the Scriptures. We want to discover that meaning. All others are wrong. I actual agree that we need to determine the correct, original meaning.

For example, the Bereans searching scripture and Paul’s instruction to Timothy to “study the scripture daily” (KJV) and that “all scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness” were all written BEFORE the Bible existed. Timothy had been studying scripture from infancy, but it must have been the old law he studied, because most of the New Testament had not yet been written and there was no compilation into a Holy Bible at that point (Mary).

Actually, at the time of Jesus the majority of the Bible did exist. 39 of the 66 books (59%) and roughly 76% of the total words of the Bible were complete. It was not as complete of a revelation as we have today, but is inaccurate to say the Bible did not exist. It existed, but in a different, less complete form. Not an inaccurate or wrong Bible, but an incomplete Bible. The Bereans were commended for searching the Old Testament Scriptures precisely because they were inspired by God. Jesus held the Jews responsible for rightly understanding the Old Testament Scriptures precisely because they bore witness to him:

You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life. I do not receive glory from people. But I know that you do not have the love of God within you. I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not receive me. If another comes in his own name, you will receive him. How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father. There is one who accuses you: Moses, on whom you have set your hope. For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” (John 5:39-47).

Jesus condemned the Jews for their incorrect understanding of the Scriptures. How much more condemnation will we face if we reject the additional light we have received through the later writings of the New Testament and its more clear revelation of Jesus as the Messiah?

Now, I want to circle back to your quote from 2 Timothy 3:16:

…“all scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness” were all written BEFORE the Bible existed (Mary).

Actually, this word from Paul to Timothy was inspired Scripture as soon as it was written down the first time. Now, what we call the full Bible consisting of both the Old and New Testament may not have been completely recognized by the Christian church at that point, however that does not change the fact that it was already the inspired word of God. (As an aside, I recommend to anyone reading this far who is interested in this topic of New Testament Scripture to go read Dr. Michael Kruger’s wonderful book, “Canon Revisited”). Mary, I hope you can also see now that the idea of reproof, correction and instruction must be tied to the understanding that there is a right and a wrong way to interpret the Bible. Not to mention that doctrine is an important concept that is based upon our righty understanding of God’s revelation in the Scripture. We must embrace the idea that right doctrine is important and desirable!

Using these passages as imperatives regarding the Bible is not exactly honest (Mary).

I am not sure what you mean here, because they are not really imperatives. Are you saying that we not all Scripture is inspired by God (or more accurately breathed out by God)? Are you saying that not all Scripture is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness? I am confused here because I doubt that this is what you meant.

I have no doubt that the Bible as we know it exists because God protected it over time from the violence of history and of evil men. But I have become convinced that we must study it in context if we are to understand its meaning for us today (Mary).

Agreed. What is interesting is that you came to my website to read about Beth Moore who regularly divorces her teaching from the context.

I really am trying to be brief here. So let me see if I can get to the bottom line of what I am trying to say (Mary).

I appreciate the time you have taken. And I am far less brief than you, Mary, so no worries.

We can focus so much on “getting it right” that we miss the point. And the “I’m right, you’re wrong” approach to Christianity will not build a sustaining faith in our children. They may know all the ways we are “right”, but they will not know why it matters — or the blessings and joy of a life in Christ, lived humbly before our God (Mary).

And this is where this line of thinking really falls apart. If it does not matter if we get it right, there is no point. Was Jesus merely a man or was he the God-man? Am I a sinner in need of a savior or a basically good person? Is there a coming judgment for sinners or does everyone go to heaven? Is there only one eternal god or are there countless gods and I can become one too? If it does not matter if we get the answers to these types of questions right, there is no point to miss. Then, there is no such thing as a definable “Christianity” and there is no thing and no one for my children to have a faith in. It is all becomes merely shifting sand.

Now, I may have a correct intellectual understanding of the Scriptures (“get it right), but reject these truths and therefore miss the point. But it would be silly to say I have an incorrect intellectual understanding of Scriptures (“get it wrong”), but get the point.

In our Bible study class this past year, we have been studying the book of Hebrews. As you, I am certain, well know, it is full of rich theology and, dare I say it, doctrine. The book of Hebrews makes it abundantly clear that it is in getting it right about the person and finished work of Jesus that provides us with assurance and allows our faith to remain strong in the face of trials and persecution. I want my children, and everyone, to know the real Jesus and the real gospel of salvation through repentance and faith in the finished work of Christ. I want their faith to be rooted in the clear understanding of God’s promises for our eternity and His unchangeable nature so we can trust those promises. Theology (our knowledge of God) matters! Doctrine (our set of beliefs) matter! What we put our faith in matters!

There is much more I could share, but just know that I am praying for you (Mary).

Thank you Mary for taking the time to write me and especially for your prayers.

I encourage you to think about what God’s mission for your life really is. Is it really about tearing apart the teachings of others and pointing out what you believe to be errors? (Mary)

My goal in life is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. I do believe that one of my callings in Christ’s church is to teach others using the Bible. Teach at home to my family, teach in my local congregation, and teach through this website. And as 2 Timothy 3:16 points out, part of that teaching involves reproof and correction. I too require teaching and continue to learn from others as I strive to become a “man of God [who is] complete, equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:17).

Or is it about the “abundant” life Jesus came to bring us — not prosperity in a material sense, but love, joy, peace and all the spiritual blessings we have in Christ Jesus? And the “everlasting” life we have in him as believers? When that is our focus, our families, our children, everyone we encounter — even enemies and people we disagree with — can see the blessings in a life lived in Christ (Mary).

Why not prosperity in a material sense? There are countless “Christians” today like Joyce Meyer and Joel Osteen who teach that part of the abundant life Jesus wants to give us is material wealth and perfect health. All we need is enough faith and perhaps to sow our seeds of faith by sending them some money? Are they wrong Mary? Is that incorrect doctrine? Should we tell them they are believing and teaching wrongly? Should we warn others about these false teachers; these wolves in sheep’s clothing?

And what spiritual blessing do we have in Christ Jesus? How would we know what those are? By reading God’s Holy Word the Bible. Last week during our Bible study in the book of Hebrews we were working through the end of chapter 11. Here we read of people of faith like David who became a king and through faith conquered kingdoms (Hebrews 11:32-33). But we also read of people of faith being stoned, sawn in two and killed by the sword. How do our friends or enemies look at a person being sawn in two and see the blessings of a life in Christ? They cannot unless we tell them the good news of the gospel of Jesus Christ and the eternal promises ahead of us as we “run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:1-2).

I would love to visit with you more (Mary).

I would love to visit with you more also Mary. There is so much more that the Bible teaches on this subject of truth, the necessity of correct doctrine and the identification of false teachings and teachers.

Now, Mary, I know your letter did not stop here, but switched topics to discuss new, personal direct revelation from God. Perhaps someday I will address the rest of your letter, but I am about 5000 words in already and this seems like a natural stopping point.

With love in Christ Jesus our Lord,

Dale

Jesus came to respond to the universal human need to…

A couple of summers ago I did some research on a small-town, rural Idaho pastor for some friends. He turned out to be an absolute heretic. Last week, I made the mistake of listening to a new sermon by this pastor. Why? It must be similar to our seemingly natural response to look at a car crash. It did not take long for this pastor to remind me of why he is a heretic when he stated:

It is the singular most important issue that Jesus came to address…

OK. I will pause here and let you think about how you would finish his sentence. What was the most important issue Jesus came to address? Think…think…think…

Do you have an answer yet? Is that your final answer? OK, are you sure you want to see this pastor’s answer? Maybe you should look away? No? OK, here is his answer:

Jesus came to respond to the universal human need to know how to live well.

That was not a minor fender-bender, but an absolute, unmitigated disaster: “the universal human need to know how to live well.” Really? He spent a week of sermon prep and came up with that? God had told us how to live well about 1500 years before Jesus came. You may not have heard of these guidelines, but they were called the Ten Commandments. We could all live exceptionally well if we just followed that simple 10 step program. In fact, Jesus even confirmed those rules as words to live by.

There is only one teensy, weensy little problem. We cannot live by them. Not you. Not me. No my Roman Catholic friends, not Mary either. Only Jesus. That law is what convicts us, condemns us, and leads us to Christ Jesus that we may be saved by faith:

But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith (Galatians 3:22-24).

Unlike the law-based gospel preached by this heretic, Jesus came not to tell or show us how to live well, but to respond to the universal human need to have our sins forgiven. We do not need more rules or excellent moral examples. We cannot keep the rules God had given long before Jesus arrived. We need a Savior. Jesus was and is that Savior:

There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12).

If you church is teaching anything remotely like the message given by this pastor I listened to—RUN!

Collapsing contexts

In his excellent book, Scripture Twisting, James Sire addresses the common error of “collapsing contexts.” Sire describes this error as follows:

When two or more unrelated texts are treated as if they belonged together, we have the fallacy of collapsing contexts. This reading error can be especially knotty because it is the corruption of a perfectly good principle of reading: to compare Scripture with Scripture (James Sire, Scripture Twisting, p. 58, L. 533)

On a recent exchange on this blog, a Mormon (LDS) commenter called the apostle Peter “the seer of the church.” To which I responded that “Peter was never described as a seer,” but that this was “an idea that the LDS church is forcing back into the history so they can say that their current structure is just like that of the very early church.” This was when this Mormon demonstrated perfectly how to collapse multiple contexts to make up the Bible say anything you want:

No, he [Peter] wasn’t. However, it is perfectly agreeable to the text [Matthew 16:17-18] to say that he was the leader of the church, and since prophets have led the church of God from the time of Adam it is in keeping with the text to say he is a prophet. Cephas means stone, and the Urim and Thummum were two stones used in the Old Testament by Seers. Then there is 1 Samuel 9: 9 “Beforetime in Israel, when a man went to inquire of God, thus he spake, Come, and let us go to the seer: for he that is now called a Prophet was beforetime called a Seer”. So to call him a seer is not entirely without support in the Bible as you claim (LDS blog commenter).

Actually, this single paragraph demonstrates a lot of the Scripture Twisting errors described by Sire in his book. But, let’s focus on just the error of “collapsing contexts.” Look at all of the (supposed) parts of the Bible that have to be brought together to get this idea to fit together:

1. Matthew 16:17-18. The church is built on Peter. This is a New Testament passage.
2. The Urim and Thummum were stones used by seers in the Old Testament.
3. Peter’s name (also called Cephas) means stone or rock.
4. Therefore, Peter  the rock was a seer.

So, Peter means rock, special rocks were used by prophets, prophets have always led the churches, prophet also can mean seer, therefore Peter was a seer. It is clearly all in the Bible, right?

No, of course not. It is a house of cards. It is coming to the Bible with a preconceived notion and then cherry-picking verses and ideas from all over the place. And, just in case you are wondering about the other errors in this paragraph:

1. The Urim and Thummum were given to the priests (see Exodus 28:30) not the prophets. Also, most priests were not prophets and most prophets were not priests.
2. The claim that prophets have been the leaders of the church since the time of Adam is not supported by the Bible.
3. The claim that Peter is the leader of the church based upon Matthew 16:17-18 is one also made by the Roman Catholic church. However, it is not supported by the evidence of the rest of the Bible or history. The church is not built upon Peter the individual but on the faith that Peter articulated in verse 16, “Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

Masters of disguise – 2 Corinthians 11:13-15

I know I should not be surprised when I see it happening over and over again. Scripture warns us that false teachers, false apostles, and Satan will disguise themselves:

For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness (2 Corinthians 11:13-15).

Still, when false religions go to great lengths to appear Christian to the outside world and hide their objectionable doctrines, it still never fails to shock me. Apparently I am just slow to learn.

For example, the LDS (Mormon) Church goes to great pains these days to appear to be just another denomination of Christianity. They try to avoid talking in public about their clearly heretical teachings, but embrace them within their own walls. The missionaries that arrive at your door are not likely to proudly proclaim their belief that they can one day be gods. Yet, when their leaders speak and write to their members, they trumpet these teachings with great joy:

How fortunate you are to be aware of the Restoration of the gospel! You know there was a premortal existence in the presence of Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ. You were schooled and tested. You learned of the laws that would allow you to progress and advance. You followed those laws, and thus you were entitled to come to earth, placing you on a course leading to exaltation, dominion, and godhood (Keith Hilbig, Ensign Magazine, July 2013).

This is from the current edition of the magazine the LDS church uses to communicate with its members. The article is excerpted from a speech he gave to students at BYU-Idaho. In it, the LDS leader discusses how fortunate they are to know about several non-Christian teachings that are mislabeled as “gospel”:

• The premortal existence of people as spirits before their birth
• That following laws in this premortal existence are what allowed the spirits to get human bodies
• That by continuing to follow laws, people can progress and advance to become gods themselves.

And all these non-Christian teachings come from only a single paragraph. But, they tend to downplay these more radical teachings as they masquerade as angels of light.

Therefore, we cannot be lazy as Christians. We must know our own faith well and ask lots of questions about the faiths of others. We must always remember that the false teachers, false apostles and even false christs will try to lead us astray by hiding behind a facade of Christianity. We must be disciples (students) of Jesus Christ and know our Bibles so we can recognize the lies when they come.

Also, we Christians must be careful not to do the same things. We should never preach a different message outside our church walls from the one we share inside the walls on a Sunday morning. We can never mislead people by trying to get them to try on a diluted version of the Christian faith in hopes they will attend our church. We want to bring them to saving faith in Jesus Christ, not make them members of our congregation.

Mary is not divine

Recently, Pope Francis released his first major work; an encyclical (letter) to the Roman Catholic bishops of the world. This encyclical is quite lengthy (20+ pages) and is reported to have been a joint effort between the current pope, Francis, and his predecessor, Benedict XVI. While I have not yet read much of the document, the closing prayer clearly shows that Roman Catholicism remains a heretical church that worships idols. Instead of praying to the Father as Jesus directed, or praying to Jesus himself, Francis finishes by praying instead to Mary. The following is taken directly from the Vatican website:

Let us turn in prayer to Mary, Mother of the Church and Mother of our faith. Mother, help our faith! Open our ears to hear God’s word and to recognize his voice and call… (Lumen Fidei).

First, I have often heard Roman Catholics argue that they do not pray “to” Mary, but “through” her. The words of their very own pope contradict that claim. This alone is idolatry. The contents of this prayer are also blasphemous as it attributes to Mary abilities that are God’s alone:

• Mary is not the Mother of our faith. It is Jesus who is the “founder  and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2).
• Mary cannot help our faith. It is God who sent the Holy Spirit to reside in our hearts (Galatians 4:6), and it is the Holy Spirit who “helps us in our weakness” (Romans 8:26) and “intercedes for us” (Romans 8:26).
• Mary cannot open our ears to hear God’s word and recognize his voice and call. The Bible clearly teaches that God grants us the ability to hear his word and to come to Jesus (John 6:65, Philippians 1:29, 2 Timothy 2:25).

In just the first two lines of this prayer, we see both the false worship of Mary and the assigning of divine attributes to Mary. This is idolatry and a clear breaking of God’s commandments.  

Catholic saints versus Christian saints

Recently there was a lot of publicity about the declaration by Pope Francis that over 800 people were now recognized by the Roman Catholic church as saints. This declaration is yet another example of how far removed the Roman Catholic church is from Biblical Christianity. The Bible makes it clear that all Christians are saints from the day they are redeemed. Almost every reference to saints in the New Testament is to the Christians who are alive at that time. Here are just a few examples:

saints at Jerusalem (Acts 9:13).

To all those in Rome who are loved by God and called to be saints (Romans 1:7).

To the church of God that is in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints (1 Corinthians 1:2).

As in all the churches of the saints (1 Corinthians 14:33).

To the saints who are in Ephesus, and are faithful in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 1:1)

As a Christian, I am a saint (holy) because I have the holy righteousness of Jesus Christ. The Roman Catholic church has perverted the idea of saints. In Jude 1:3, the term saints is again used to describe the living Christians:

Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3).

This verse also points to the falsehood of the Roman Catholic church. Not only have they perverted the meaning of the term saints, but they do not teach that the faith was delivered “once for all.” They have been adding and changing the beliefs for thousands of years by going beyond the Scriptures.

So, I hope you are a saint today, saved by faith alone in the the blood of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And, if you are a saint, you should be in God’s house worshiping and studying with other saints this weekend.

 

With friends like these…

Over the weekend I attended the graduation ceremony at the local Northwest Nazarene University (NNU). NNU bills itself as “one of the premier Christian institutions of higher education in the Northwest.” While I have long known of NNU’s liberal leanings, it was still shocking to hear the speaker, President Emeritus Dr. Richard Hagood, refer to heretic Dallas Willard as one of his favorite authors. It is sad that a person with such poor discernment could rise to the level of president in a supposed “Christian” university. If you are not familiar with Dallas Willard, he is one of the leaders of this spiritual formation movement which often steers into mysticism, contemplative prayer, and other New Age practices.

If you are considering sending you child to a “Christian” college, make sure you look beyond just their simple statement of faith. Look at the reading lists of their courses. For example, NNU’s reading lists for various courses include materials from heretics such as Rob Bell, Richard Foster, Dallas Willard, Henri Nouwen, Brother Lawrence, and Eugene Peterson. Goodness! At least at a secular school your kids will not be told that the garbage they are studying is Christian.

Buying some pro-adultery T-shirts! Making molehills out of mountains – Part 3

Today is part 3 of my review of an article entitled A Mountain I’m Willing to Die On. You can read parts 1 and 2. The last part of that article is a hypothetical letter written to the author’s son which begins:

Dear Chase,

Whoever you are, whoever you become, you are loved. You are a miracle. You are our dream come true.

Chase, here is what would happen in our home if one day you were to tell your father and me that you are an adulterer, idolater and thief.

Our eyes would open wide.

Then we would grab you and hold you tighter than you would be able to bear. And while we were holding you, we would say a silent prayer that as little time as possible passed between the moment you knew you were an adulterer, idolater and thief and the moment you told us. And we would love you and ask you one million questions, and then we would love you some more and finally, I would rush out to buy some pro-adultery, pro-idolatry and pro-theft T-shirts, honey, because you know Mama likes to have an appropriate outfit for every occasion.

And I don’t mean, Chase, that we would be tolerant of you and your adultery, idolatry, and thievery. If our goal is to be tolerant of people who are different than we are, Chase, then we really are aiming quite low. Traffic jams are to be tolerated. People are to be celebrated. Every person is Divine. And so there would be celebrating. Celebrating that you had stepped closer to matching your outsides with your insides—to being who you are. And there would be a teeny part of my heart that would leap at the realization that I would forever be the most important woman in your life. Then we would tell everyone. We would not concern ourselves too much with their reactions. There will always be party poopers, baby.

Honey, we’ve worried that since we are Christians, and since we love the Bible so much, there might come a day when you feel unclear about our feelings about this, since there are parts in the Bible that appear to discuss adultery, idolatry, and thievery as a sin. Let us be clear about how we feel, because we have spent years of research and prayer and discussion deciding.

Chase, we don’t believe that adultery, idolatry, and thievery is a sin.

Feel free to replace the adultery, idolatry, and thievery with your favorite sins. How about greed, drunkenness, or murder. Or all of the above! Sounds ludicrous, right. Well, let’s review one of the Bible’s clear lists of sins:

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-10).

Notice the four bold sins I highlighted from these verses? Three of them I included in my version of the letter above. As you probably figured out, the fourth, homosexuality, was the one included by Glennon in her original version of the letter. Homosexuality appears in the middle of that list and I have not heard too many people arguing for us to embrace any of those other sins. Our society and authors like Glennon encourage us to embrace certain sins rather than preach repentance. This is not the message of the Bible. This is not the message preached by Jesus. This is not the true Christian faith, but a false gospel that does not save.

Ironically, these individuals are overly concerned about the temporal anguish associated with bullying here on earth, but unconcerned with the eternal anguish the unsaved will experience in hell. In actuality, it is MORE loving to warn them of their sin and the coming judgment than to help them embrace their sin and miss out on salvation. As the title of my article series implies, these people are trying to take the impassable mountains that are sin and God’s wrath and pretend they are molehills that can be ignored.

In the words of Charles Spurgeon:

If sinners be damned, at least let them leap to Hell over our dead bodies. And if they perish, let them perish with our arms wrapped about their knees, imploring them to stay. If Hell must be filled, let it be filled in the teeth of our exertions, and let not one go unwarned and unprayed for.

And, lest anyone think I missed the other glaring, blasphemous line in this portion of Glennon’s hypothetical letter…No, people are not divine! The only divine human is Jesus Christ. But, it is this idolatry of self that is at the root of the problem. When we place our feelings and our reason above the clear word of God, we are putting ourselves above God himself.

I had hoped to finish this review in 3 days, but so much ground to cover I will pick it up again next week with part 4.

Sinless repentance is an oxymoron. Making molehills out of mountains – Part 2

Picking up from yesterday’s post, the next statement from the blog article A Mountain I’m Willing to Die On that I want to address is:

I better make sure that my children know beyond a shadow of a doubt that in God’s and their father’s and my eyes, they are okay. They are loved as they are. Without a single unless (Glennon).

This the lie condemned by the apostle John:

If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us (1 John 1:8).

And if we are okay, then why did Jesus’ ministry begin with the preaching of repentance:

Jesus came into Galilee, proclaiming the gospel of God, and saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:14-15).

If I am okay and loved by God as I am, what do I need to repent of? Couldn’t Jesus have just said, “Good job Dale. You’re doing great! Don’t change a thing! I love you just the way you are. Have a nice day.” If we deny our sinful nature, as Glennon implicitly does in her article, then we deny the need for repentance. Sinless repentance is an oxymoron.

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you (1 Corinthians 6:9-11).

If the unrighteous are okay in God’s sight, why will they not inherit the kingdom of God? And why did Paul have to make note of the fact that these people quit doing these sinful things?

Most importantly, if God loves us despite our sins, why did Jesus have to die that horrific death on the cross? Was that really necessary? Jesus seemed to think it was necessary:

From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised (Matthew 16:21).

Why did Paul seem to think that Jesus death was of primary importance:

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3).

The Good News is not that you are okay. Besides, you know that is a lie because you know your heart and your thoughts. The Good News is that God knows you are NOT okay, but rather that you are dead in your sins. But, he loved sinners enough to send his only son and pour out his wrath upon him instead. So, we must repent of our sins and put our trust in Jesus for forgiveness of those sins.

In the context of bullying, Christians should never bully because we should recognize our own sin. But we also should never allow people to die in their sins without their hearing the law and the gospel.

Here is the link to part 3.

Making molehills out of mountains – Part 1

Recently, a dear friend commented positively on a blog article that led me to do a little reading. I had never heard of this particular website or the author, Glennon, but she is apparently quite popular having over 70,000 followers. For the rest of the week, I want to review parts of a recent article she wrote entitled A Mountain I’m Willing to Die On. On its surface, the article addresses the issue of childhood bullying. But, underlying it is an attack on the fundamentals of the Christian faith by someone who claims to be an insider. I am not trying to pick on the author who is probably a very nice person. I am just hoping to shed some Biblical light on her erroneous views of Christianity. For starters:

Children are not cruel. Children are mirrors. They want to be “grownup,” so they act how grown-ups act when we think they’re not looking. They do not act how we tell them to act at school assemblies. They act how we really act. They believe what we believe. They say what we say (Glennon).

It is a common perception of our society that children are born as clean slates. However, it is a lie that goes against both the Bible and our human experience. First, and most importantly, here are a few things the Bible teaches about our sinful nature:

For the intention of man’s heart is evil from his youth (Genesis 8:21).

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me (Psalm 51:5).

We inherit our sinful natures from our fallen great-grandfather, Adam. The Genesis 8:21 verse is always striking to me because God makes that claim about our hearts when the only people left on earth are “righteous” Noah and his family. And, if you read on to chapter 9, Noah and his sons confirm God’s judgment by acting like the evil sinners they were.

Sure, children act like we act because they too are sinners. But, we do not have to teach them how to sin. No one taught my children to lie, steal, bite, covet, mock, etc. I did not teach my 2-year old to mock her brother in song! My wife and I do not go around the house melodically taunting each other and then biting each other when we do not get our way. My 2-year old and her siblings and her parents were born as sinners, live as sinners, and will remain sinners until God completely removes the sin from our lives after our deaths.

Is believing in original sin important? Yes! If you do not believe we are conceived as sinners, then why do infants die?

For the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23).

If they are not yet sinners, then they should not die. Also, if you deny our inherited sin nature then we could all just work our way to heaven through our good works. Finally, if we do not inherit our sinful nature from the one man, Adam, how then do we inherit our righteousness through the one man, Jesus? Paul clearly tied the two together:

Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come. But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ. Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous (Romans 5:14-19).

Glennon, and so many others like her, want to believe that humanity is just a little bent out of shape. We only need some better role models, better education, and denial of sin to churn out an endless supply of wonderful, perfectly friendly little people. Sorry, but the Bible and about 6000 years of human history clearly disagree.

Part 2 tomorrow.